#Metoo

A struggle for social recognition and justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22500

Keywords:

sexual harassment, #metoo, social recognition, epistemic injustice

Abstract

In the article Honneth’s theory of social recognition and Frickers’ theory of epistemic injustice is used to analyse testimonies of sexual harassment. The study is based on a content analysis of the testimonies about sexual harassment that are included in the 65 Swedish #metoo calls. Those who testified talk about what, with help of Honneth’s theory, can be described as a systematic withholding of social recognition. They are denied solidarity and rights through sexualized physical and psychological abuse, which has a negative impact on their basic self-confidence, self-respect, and self-esteem. In practice, the actions of the perpetrators result in both personal suffering for the women who has been subjected to sexual harassment and to the exclusion of them from social contexts. The latter takes place by the women either leaving the context in which they have been subjected to sexual harassment or to their participation in the context being conditional. For example, they must refrain from telling what they have been through or they lack support when they do. In the article, the difficulty of mobilizing support for those who are subjected to sexual harassment is interpreted as an effect of epistemic injustice.

Author Biographies

  • Emma Engdahl

    Professor i sociologi vid inst. för sociologi och arbetsvetenskap, Göteborgs universitet

  • Hans Ekbrand

    Lektor vid inst. för sociologi och arbetsvetenskap, Göteborgs universitet

Downloads

Published

2021-12-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“#Metoo: A Struggle for Social Recognition and Justice”. 2021. Sociologisk Forskning 58 (3): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.58.22500.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 377

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)