(Dis)affordances and abandonment
Understanding everyday user engagement with security apps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.62.27825Nyckelord:
Security technologies, mobile applications, (dis)affordances, user engagement, securitisationAbstract
In recent decades, numerous security technologies have emerged with the aim of fostering secure communities and providing people with the tools to bolster their everyday safety. Focusing specifically on security apps, this article explores how apps addressing security in public and semi-public spaces constitute preconditions for everyday user engagement, and vice versa, how users actively respond to these preconditions. Through identifying the (dis)affordances involved in such processes, we investigate co-production of user engagement with security apps. Drawing on observations and interviews with producers and users of apps, we explore the landscape of security apps as pervaded by processes of intended and actual (dis)affordances, sometimes also leading to abandonment of both use and users. A key finding is the divergence between the intended purposes of these apps – often framed around broad security ambitions – and their actual use, which frequently intertwines with mundane routines and logistical needs. This divergence paradoxically legitimizes broader securitisation discourses, even as the apps’ “successful use” often reflects a relatively privileged everyday life distant from tangible threats, highlighting the complex interplay between market forces, user practices, and the normalisation of surveillance.
Referenser
Aas, K. (2006) “Ta vare på deg selv, lommeboka, mobile og dine venner”, 73–95 in T.H. Eriksen (Ed.) Trygghet. Oslo: Universitetsforlag.
Akrich, M. & B. Latour (1992) “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies”, 259–264 in W.E. Bijker & J.Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Andersson, R. (2010) “Tryggare kan ingen vara. En svensk kriminalpolitik för 2000-talet”, 141–163 in T. Hjort, P. Lalander & R. Nilsson (Eds.) Den ifrågasatte medborgaren. Om utsatta gruppers relation till välfärdssystemet. Växjö: Linnéuniversitetet.
Andreassen, R., A. Kaun & K. Nikunen (2021) “Fostering the data welfare state: A Nordic perspective on datafication”, Nordicom Review 42 (2):207–223. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0051
Barth, S. & M.D. De Jong (2017) ”The privacy paradox–Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior–A systematic literature review”, Telematics and informatics 34 (7):1038–1058.
Bauman, Z. (2006) Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2011) Community. Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bloomfield, B.P., Y. Latham & T. Vurdubakis (2010) “Bodies, technologies and action possibilities: When is an affordance?”, Sociology 44 (3):415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803851036246
Broeker, F. (2023) “ʻWe went from the anonymity of the internet into my private WhatsApp’: Rituals of transition among dating app users in Berlin”, New Media and Society 25 (10):2551–2571. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144482110292
Bucchi, M. & B. Trench (2014) Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039242
Bucher, T. (2016) “The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms”, Information, Communication & Society 20 (1):30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
Ceccato, V. (2019) “Eyes and apps on the streets: From surveillance to sousveillance using smartphones”, Criminal Justice Review 44 (1):25–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016818818696
Chand, D., S. Nayak, K.S. Bhat, S. Parikh, Y. Singh & A.A. Kamath (2015) “A mobile application for women's safety: WoSApp”. 1–5 in TENCON 2015 - 2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2015.7373171
Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Chatterjee, R., P. Doerfler, H. Orgad, S. Havron, J. Palmer, D. Freed, K. Levy, N. Dell, D. McCoy & T. Ristenpart (2018) “The spyware used in intimate partner violence”, 441–458 in 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020) Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001
Cumiskey, K.M. & K. Brewster (2012) “Mobile phones or pepper spray?”, Feminist Media Studies 12 (4):590–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741893
Dieter, M., C. Gerlitz, A. Helmond, N. Tkacz, F. van der Vlist & E. Weltevrede (2018) Store, interface, package, connection. Methods and propositions for multi-situated app studies. CRC Media of cooperation working paper series, vol. 4. Collaborative Research Center 1187, Siegen: University of Siegen. https://www001.zimt.unisiegen.de/ojs/index.php/wps1187/article/view/29/31
Engestrom, Y. (1990) Learning, Working and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Fassin, D. (2014) “Petty states of exception: The contemporary policing of the urban poor”, 104–117 in M. Maguire, C. Frois & N. Zurawski (Eds.) The anthropology of security: Perspectives from the frontline of policing, counter‐terrorism and border control. London: Pluto Press.
Fawaz, M. & H. Bou Akar (2012) “Practicing (in)security in the city”, City & Society 24 (2):105–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2012.01070
Ferguson, A.G. (2017) The rise of big data policing. Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. New York: New York University Press.
Flensburg, S. & S.S. Lai (2022) “Datafied mobile markets: Measuring control over apps, data accesses, and third-party services”, Mobile Media and Communication 10 (1):136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211039066
Flyghed, J. & M. Hörnqvist (2003) Laglöst land. Stockholm: Ordfront.
Franko, K., H.O Gundhus & H.M. Lomell (2008) Technologies of insecurity. The surveillance of everyday life. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
Fraser, C., E. Olsen, K. Lee, C. Southworth & S. Tucker (2010) “The new age of stalking: Technological implications for stalking”, Juvenile and family court journal 61 (4): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2010.01051.x
Garland, D. (1996) “The limits of the sovereign state. Strategies of crime control in contemporary society”, British Journal of Criminology 36 (4):445–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105
Garland, D. (2001) The culture of control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, J.J. (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. London: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J.J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Houghton Mifflin.
Hermansson, K. (2018) “Den svenska tryggheten: en studie av en kriminalpolitisk symbol”, Sociologisk Forskning 55 (2–3):179–202. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.55.18189
Hermansson, K. (2023) “Emotional expressions in the Swedish discourse on crime. A comparison of the 2018 Moderate and Social Democratic election campaigns”, Sociologisk forskning 60 (1): 33–55. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.60.24779
Hope, T. & R. Sparks (2000) Crime, risk and insecurity. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203389492
Hutchby, I. (2001). “Technologies, texts and affordances”, Sociology 35 (2):441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Hutchby, I. (2003). “Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediated interaction: A response to Brian Rappert”, Sociology 37 (3):581–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373011
Interaction Design Foundation (2024), “Affordances,” retrieved April 12 2025,
from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/affordances.
Kaufmann, M. (2021). “This Is a Secret: Learning from children’s engagement with surveillance and secrecy”, Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies 21 (5): 424-437.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086211029350
Kennedy, L. & M. Coelho (2022) “Security, suspicion, and surveillance? There’s an app for that”, Surveillance and Society 20 (2):127–141. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3012-5544
Kettrey, H. H., M.L. Tidwell, S.R. Burke, S. Duncan, M. Nwajei, N.S. Reynolds, C. Waddell, S. Scott, C. Imbody, M. Jerge, J. Young, N. Nishan, A. Rathi & J. Jackson (2024) “Crime control or just theater? An experimental test of the effects of a mobile safety app on crime prevention intentions and behaviors”, Journal of Experimental Criminology, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09613-0
Lai, S. & S. Flensburg (2020a) “A proxy for privacy uncovering the surveillance ecology of mobile apps”, Big Data and Society 7 (2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942543
Lai, S.S. & S. Flensburg (2020b) “Appscapes in everyday life: Studying mobile datafication from an infrastructural user perspective”, MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 36 (69):29–51. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.121018
Ling, R. & C.H. Lai (2016) “Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps”, Journal of Communication 66 (5):834–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251
Low, S. (2008) “Fortification of residential neighbourhoods and the new emotions of home”, Housing, Theory and Society 25 (1):47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090601151038
Lupton, D. (2012) “M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society”, Social Theory and Health 12 (10):229–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.6
Lupton, D. (2014) “Critical perspectives on digital health technologies”, Sociology Compass 8 (12):1344–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12226
Maxwell, L., A. Sanders, J. Skues & L. Wise (2020) “A content analysis of personal safety apps: are they keeping us safe or making us more vulnerable?” Violence against women 26 (2):233–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219832124
McVeigh-Schultz, J. & N.K. Baym (2015) “Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, couple”, Social Media + Society 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604649
Maguire, M., C. Frois & N. Zurawski (2014) The anthropology of security: Perspectives from the frontline of policing, counter-terrorism and border control. London: Pluto Press.
Malone, K. (2007) “The bubble‐wrap generation: children growing up in walled gardens”, Environmental Education Research 13 (4):513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701581612
Masco, J. (2014) The theatre of operations: National security affect from the Cold War to the war on terror. Durham: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (2005) “Fear (the spectrum said)”, Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 13 (1):31–48. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-13-1-31
Messing, J., M. Bagwell-Gray, M.,M.L. Brown, M. L., A. Kappas, A., & A. Durfee, A. (2020). ”Intersections of stalking and technology-based abuse: Emerging definitions, conceptualization, and measurement”., Journal of Ffamily Vviolence, 35 (7):, 693–-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00114-7
Michael, M. (2000). These Boots Are Made for Walking...: Mundane Technology, the Body and Human-Environment Relations. Body & Society, 6(3-4), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006003006 (Original work published 2000)
Michael, M. & D. Lupton (2016) “Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’”, Public Understanding of Science 25 (1):104–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515609005
Morris, J.W. & E. Elkins (2015) “There’s a history for that: Apps and mundane software as commodity”, Fibreculture Journal (25):62–87. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.25.181.2015
Mulinari, L.S. (2022). Folkets Husbys trygghetsundersökning 2022: Communityperspektiv på kriminalitet och utsatthet. Stockholm: Folkets Husby.
Mulinari, L.S. (2024). Folkets husbys trygghetsundersökning 2024: Tidöavtalet och omförhandlingen av samhällskontraktet. Stockholm: Folkets Husby.
Neocleous, M. (2008) Critique of security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748632329
Norman, D.A. (1988) The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Oostveen, A., M., A. Vasalou, A., P. Van den Besselaar , P., and I.& Brown , I. (2014). ”Child location tracking in the US and the UK: Same technology, different social implications”,. Surveillance & Society, 12 (4):, 581–-593. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.4937
Pink, S., S. Sumartojo, D. Lupton & C. Heyes La Bond (2017) “Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living”, Big Data and Society 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717700924
Rappert, B. (2003) “Technologies, texts and possibilities: A reply to Hutchby”, Sociology 37 (3): 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373010
Riddell, A. (2023) “Intersecting positionalities and the unexpected uses of digital crime and safety tracking in Brooklyn”, Social Inclusion 11 (3):30–40. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i3.6615
Sahlin Lilja, H. (2018) “’Otrygghet’ i politisk kommunikation: En begreppslig jämförelse och analys av 1970 and 2010-talen”, Nordisk tidsskrift for kriminalvidenskab 105 (2):170–190. https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v105i2.120551
SFS 2023:196. Kommuners ansvar för brottsförebyggande arbete. (Swedish
statute).
Simpson, B. (2014) “Tracking children, constructing fear: GPS and the manufacture of family safety”, Information and Communications Technology Law 23 (3):273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2014.970377
Stanko, E. (2000) “Victims r us. The life history of ‘fear of crime’ and the politicization of violence”, 13–30 in T. Hope and R. Sparks (Eds.) Crime, risk and insecurity. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203389492
Viswanath, K. and A. Basu (2015) “SafetiPin: an innovative mobile app to collect data on women's safety in Indian cities”, Gender and Development 23 (1):45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2015.1013669
Wacquant, L. (2010) Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
White, D. and L. McMillan (2020) “Innovating the problem away? A critical study of Anti-rape technologies”, Violence against women 26 (10):1120–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219856115
Winter, K. (2025) “Longing and lacking: Pasts, presents, and futures in municipal crime prevention technology”, Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v13i1.5857
Wood, M.A., S. Ross & D. Johns (2022) “Primary crime prevention apps: A typology and scoping review”, Trauma, Violence and Abuse 23 (4):1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020985560
Woolgar, S. (2002)“After word? – On some dynamics of duality interrogation”, Theory, Culture & Society 19 (5-6):261–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760276189925
Young, A. (1996) Imagining crime. Textual outlaws and criminal conversations. London: Sage.
Zuboff, S. (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
Downloads
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Katarina Winter, Klara Hermansson

Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Allt material i Sociologisk Forskning publiceras med omedelbar öppen tillgång (open access), under Creative Commons-licensen CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Allt innehåll i tidskriften är fritt tillgängligt utan kostnad och får för icke-kommersiella syften fritt läsas, laddas ned, kopieras, delas, skrivas ut och länkas. Innehållet får dock inte ändras. När innehållet används måste författare och källa anges. Upphovsrätten till innehållet tillhör respektive författare. Inga publiceringsavgifter tas ut.