Theory as text or theory as activities?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.59.24247Keywords:
theory, activity, text, theorizing, fact-laden, writing, printingAbstract
In this article, which was delivered as a keynote address at the annual meeting of the Swedish Sociological Association on March 16, 2022 in Uppsala, the following argument is made. Two different approaches to theory in sociology are presented and discussed: theory as text and theory as activities. In the former, theory is seen as embodied in a text, and the focus is squarely on its content. Little attempt is made in the text to discuss how the theory was actually developed and how to use it. In theory as activities, in contrast, the main focus is on how to work with a theory in a concrete manner. The basic unit of analysis is here not just the theory, but the theory as part of the research process. Theory, method and facts are all linked together in this process and partly overlap. A number of activities that precede the publication of a theory as well as come after are also explored. The concluding pages contain a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages that come with working with each of the two views of theory.
References
Abbott, A. (2014) Digital paper: A manual for research and writing with library and internet materials. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abend, G. (2008) “The meaning of ‘theory’”, Sociological Theory 26 (2):173–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x
Becker, H. (2007[1986]) Writing for social scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Benzecry, C., M. Krause & I. Reed (2017) Social theory now. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blau, P. (1979) “Elements of sociological theorizing”, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 7 (1):103–127.
Blau, P. (1997) “Introduction to the Transaction edition”, ix–xxiii in P. Blau & J. Schwartz, Crosscutting social circles. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351313049
Blumer, H. (1954) “What is wrong with social theory?”, American Sociological Review 19 (1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165
Bourdieu, P. (1977[1972]) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu, P. (1986[1979]) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1990[1980]) The logic of practice. London: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1987) “Reading, readers, the literate, literature”, 94–105 in P. Bourdieu (1990), In other words. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2002) “Sur l’esprit de la recherche,” 175–239 in Y. Delsaut & M.-C. Rivière. Bibliographie des travaux de Pierre Bourdieu. Pantin: Le Temps des Cerises.
Bourdieu, P. (2004[2002]) Science of science and reflexivity. London: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2018) Classification struggles: General sociology, vol. 1. Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–82. London: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2020) Habitus and field: General sociology, vol. 2. Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–83. London: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. & L. Wacquant (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Braithwaite, R. (1953) Scientific explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brubaker, R. (1993) “Social theory as habitus”, 212–234 in C. Calhoun, E. Lipuma & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. London: Polity Press.
Bruch, E. (2014) “How population structure shapes neighborhood segregation”, American Journal of Sociology 119 (5):1227–1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/675411
Burawoy, M. (2021) “Living sociology: Being in the world one studies”, Annual Review of Sociology 47:17-40.
Burke, P. (2015) The French historical revolution: The Annales school 1929–2014. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Calhoun, C., J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff & I. Virk (Eds.) (2022) Contemporary sociological theory. Fourth edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Cartwright, N. (2020) “Middle-range theory: Without it what could anyone do?”, Theoria 35 (3):269–323. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.21479
Cartwright, N. & R. Runhardt (2014) “Measurement”, 265–287 in N. Cartwright & E. Montuschi (Eds.), Philosophy of social science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N., T. Shomar & M. Suárez (1995) “The tool box of science: Tools for the building of models with a superconductivity example”, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and Humanities 44:137–149.
Cavallo, G. & R. Chartier (Eds.) (1997) A history of reading in the West. London: Polity Press.
Chomsky, N. (1966) Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Clemens, E., W. Powell, K. McIlwaine & D. Okamoto (1995) “Careers in print: Books, journals and scholarly reputation”, American Journal of Sociology 101 (2):433–494. https://doi.org/10.1086/230730
Collins, R. (2019) “Writing with force and ease”, https://www.drrandallcollins.com/creativity-via-sociology/2019/7/3/writing-with-force-and-ease (Accessed 22 February 2022)
Coser, L. (1977) Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. Second edition. New York: Waveland Press.
Csiszar, A. (2018) The scientific journal: Authorship and the politics of knowledge in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Descartes, R. (1637) “Discourse on the method of rightly conducting one’s reason and of seeking truth in the sciences”, 25–91 in R. Descartes (1968) Discourse on method and the meditations. London: Penguin.
Descartes, R. (1649) “The passions of the soul”, 325–404 in R. Descartes (1985) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805042.010
Detering, N. (2011) “How to read a sociology article”, https://ablconnect.harvard.edu/book/how-read-sociology-article (Accessed 12 January 2022).
Durkheim, É. (2002[1897]) Suicide: A study in sociology. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994320
Edwards, M. (2015) Writing in sociology. Second edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Eisenstein, E. (1979) The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107049963
Eisenstein, E. (2005) The printing revolution in early modern Europe. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819230
Ekegren, P. (1999) The reading of theoretical texts. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203021828
Foucault, M. (1985[1984]) The history of sexuality, vol. 2: The use of pleasure. New York: Pantheon.
Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goldthorpe, J. (1997) “The integration of sociological research and theory: Grounds for optimism at the end of the twentieth century”, Rationality and Society 9 (4):405–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346397009004002
Goldthorpe, J. (2021) Pioneers of sociological science: Statistical foundations and the theory of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108933254
Goody, J. (1987) The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. & I. Watt (1963) “The consequences of literacy”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (3):304–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001730
Hacking, I. (1992) “The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences”, 29–64 in A. Pickering (Ed.) Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hadot, P. (2002) What is ancient philosophy? Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Hammond, P. (1964) Sociologists at work: The craft of social research. New York: Basic Books.
Hanson, N.R. (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Havelock, E. (1963) Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Hudson, N. (2002) “Challenging Eisenstein: Recent studies in print culture”, Eighteenth-Century Life 26 (2):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1215/00982601-26-2-83
Joas, H. (1997) The creativity of action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Klein, J. & G. Giglioni (2020) “Francis Bacon”, in E.N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Fall 2020 edition. Stanford: Stanford University.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2001) “Objectual practice”, 175–188 in T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
Krippner, G. (2000) “How to read a (quantitative) journal article”, https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/savvy/introtosociology/Documents/MethodsDocuments/KrippnerReadingQuantArticle.html (Accessed 12 January 2022).
Kuhn, T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leahey, E. (2008) “Methodological memes and mores: Towards a sociology of social research”, Annual Review of Sociology 34:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134731
Leed, E. (1982) “Review essay: Elizabeth Eisenstein’s The printing press as an agent of change and the structure of communications revolutions”, American Journal of Sociology 88 (2):413–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/227682
Lynch, M. (1997) “Theorizing practice” (review of S. Turner, Social theory of practices), Human Studies 20 (3):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005336830104
Markovsky, B. (2008) “Graduate training in sociological theory and theory construction”, Sociological Perspectives 51 (2):423–445. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2008.51.2.423
Merton, R.K. (1945) “Sociological theory”, American Journal of Sociology 50 (6):462–473. https://doi.org/10.1086/219686
Merton, R.K. (1965a) “Correspondance with Elizabeth Eisenstein”, box 23, folder 5 in the Robert K. Merton collection at the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University Library.
Merton, R.K. (1965b) On the shoulders of giants: A Shandean postscript. New York: The Free Press.
Merton, R.K. (1968) Social theory and social structure. Enlarged edition. New York: The Free Press.
Merton, R.K. (1976) Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: The Free Press.
Merton, R.K. (1980) “On the oral transmission of knowledge”, 1–36 in R.K. Merton & M.W. Riley (Eds.) Sociological traditions from generation to generation. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Merton, R.K. (1998) “Afterword”, 295–318 in C. Mongardini & S. Tabboni (Eds.), Robert K. Merton and contemporary sociology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351291361
Merton, R.K. & C. Persell (1984) “An interview with Robert K. Merton”, Teaching Sociology 11 (4):355–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/1317796
Mullins, N. (1971) The art of theory: Construction and use. New York: Harper & Row.
Nightingale, A.W. (2004) Spectacles of truth in classical Greek philosophy: Theioria in its cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482564
Ogden, C.K. & I.A. Richards (1989) The meaning of meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Olson, D.R. (1994) The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, W. (1982) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203103258
Paul, A.M. (2021) The extended mind: The power of thinking outside the mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Pavese, C. (2021) “Knowledge how”, in E.N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Summer 2021 edition. Stanford: Stanford University.
Peirce, C.S. (1929) “Guessing”, The Hound & Horn 2 (3):267–282.
Peirce, C.S. (1992[1898]) Reasoning and the logic of things: The Cambridge conferences lectures of 1898. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pickering, A. (1992) “From science as knowledge to science as practice”, 1–28 in A. Pickering (Ed.) Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Plato (1997a) “Phaedrus”, 506–556 in J. Cooper (Ed.) Complete works. Cambridge: Hacket.
Plato (1997b) “Letters”, 1634–1676 in J. Cooper (Ed.) Complete works. Cambridge: Hacket.
Polanyi, M. (1966) The tacit dimension. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Pomata, G. (2011) “Observation rising: Birth of an epistemic genre, 1500–1650”, 45–80 in L. Daston & E. Lunbeck (Eds.) Histories of scientific observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Qian, G. (2015) “Books or articles: Which are more important in the scientific evaluation of the different sciences?”, Current Science 109 (11): 1925–1928.
Radkau, J. (2008) “Max Weber between ‘eruptive creativity’ and ‘disciplined transdisciplinarity’”, 13–30 in F. Adloff & M. Borutta (Eds.), Max Weber in the 21st Century. EUI Working Paper MWP 2008/356. Florence: European University Institute.
Radkau, J. (2009) Max Weber: A biography. London: Polity Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1938) Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reisberg, D. (Ed.) (2013) The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.001.0001
Ritzer, G. & J. Stepinsky (2018) Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: The basics. Fifth edition. London: SAGE.
Rueschemeyer, D. (2009) Usable theory: Analytic tools for social and political research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ryle, G. (2009[1949]) “Knowing how and knowing that”, 16–20 in G. Ryle, The concept of mind. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875858
Schickore, J. (2008) “Doing science, writing science”, Philosophy of Science 75 (3):323–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/592951
Simon, H. (1991) Models of my life. New York: Basic Books.
Smelser, N. (1971) Sociological theory: A contemporary view. how to read, construct and do theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Smith-Lovin, L. & C. Moskovitz (2016) Writing in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Soler, L., S. Zwart, M. Lynch & V. Israel-Jost (Eds.) (2014) Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857985
Stark, D. (2019) “What is your publication strategy?”, Sociologica 13 (1):1. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9377
Stinchcombe, A. (1968) Constructing social theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Suppe, F. (1998) “The structure of a scientific paper”, Philosophy of Science 65 (3):381–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/392651
Swedberg, R. (2014) The art of social theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Swidler, A. (1986) “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies”, American Sociological Review 51 (2):273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
Turner, S. (1994) The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge and presuppositions. Oxford: Polity Press.
Vaughan, D. (2004) “Theorizing disaster: Analogy, historical ethnography, and the Challenger accident”, Ethnography 5 (3):315–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138104045659
Wacquant, L. (n.d.) “Practical tips for reading sociology” (handout for students in sociology, UC Berkeley), http://gsi.berkeley.edu/media/Practical-Tips-for-Reading-Sociology.pdf (12 January 2022)
Weber, M. (2001[1905]) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995808
Weber, M. (1917) “Science as a vocation”, 129–156 in H.H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.) (2009[1946]) From Max Weber. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452196
Weber, M. (1978[1921]) Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weber, M. (2019[1921]) Economy and society: A new translation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weber, M. (1988[1922]) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Weber, M. (2012) Briefe 1918–1920. Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, volume II/10,1. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Whyte, W.F. (1993) “On the evolution of Street corner society”, 279–373 in W.F. Whyte (1993[1943]) Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wootton, D. (2015) The invention of science: A new history of the scientific revolution. New York: Harper.
Zerubavel, E. (2021) Generally speaking: An invitation to concept-driven sociology. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197519271.001.0001
Zhao, S. (1996) “The beginning of the end or the end of the beginning? The theory construction movement revisited”, Sociological Forum 11 (2):305–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408369
Zuckerman, H. & R.K. Merton (1971) “Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system”, Minerva 9 (1):66–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553188
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All content in Sociologisk Forskning is published with immediate open access, under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
All content may be read, downloaded, shared and printed for non-commercial purposes, free and without fees. Contents may not be altered. When content is reused, author, source and a link to the copyright licence must be provided. The author retains copyright to their content. No publication fees are charged.
