Representations of Swedish rural areas in the last 50 years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.62.26626Keywords:
Rural, Rurality, Representation, Discourse, Sweden, GrowthAbstract
This article focuses on something that is often taken for granted in rural sociology, namely the dichotomous image of rural areas as either idyllic and innovative or abandoned and backwards. It is common for both critical researchers and rural advocates to try to challenge reductive representations with questions about what it really is like, but there is a lack of longitudinal studies that analyze how the image of rural areas has emerged and changed over time, for example in political discourses. This historical perspective is necessary to understand contemporary representations of rural areas and their underlying assumptions. This study provides such an overview by analyzing ten government investigations from the last 50 years using Carol Bacchi’s "what is the problem represented to be" approach. I identify problems that have existed for a long time and things that are new or only existed for a short time. Among other contributions, the article shows how the growth paradigm has become a taken for granted starting point for how rural areas are represented in the political discourse.
References
Anshelm, J. (1992) Vattenkraft och naturskydd. En analys av opinionen mot vattenkraftsutbyggnaden i Sverige 1950–1990. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
Arora-Jonsson, S. (2022) ”Systemskifte för vem. Landsbygden och den stora galenskapen”, 517–537 i N. Altermark & M. Dahlstedt, Bortom systemskiftet: mot en ny gemenskap. Stockholm: Verbal.
Arora-Jonsson, S. & R. McAreavey (2023) ”From crisis to sustainability. The politics of knowledge production on rural Europe”, Sociologia Ruralis 2023(63): 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12446
Arora-Jonsson, S. & A. Stiernström (2025) ”Toward a green transition. A post- and decolonial analysis of green state Sweden”, 269–286 i M. McEachrane & L.Faye (red.) Decolonial Sweden. Routledge Studies on African and Black Diaspora 12. London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Bacchi, C. (2012) ”Introducing the ’What’s the Problem Represented to Be?’ Approach”, 21–24 i A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (red.). Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
Ceccato, V., L. O. Persson & E. Westholm (2000) ”Forskning om och för landsbygds- och glesbygdsutveckling. Kunskapsöversikt år 2000”, Nordregio.
Ehrlich, Paul. 1968. The population bomb. Rivercity Press.
Eriksson, M., A. S. Lundgren & R. H. Eriksson (2025) ”The heroes and killjoys of green megaprojects: a feminist critique”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 18(2): 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaf002
Forsberg, A. (2022) ”Rural community development in Sweden: from challenging to mainstream?”, 121–42 i Z. Kravchenko, L. Kings & K. Jezierska (red.) Resourceful civil society. Navigating the changing landscapes of civil society organizations. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99007-7_5
Garbis, Z., T. Heleniak, G. Poelzer, C. Söderberg & R. Orttung (2024) ”’The ketchup effect.’ Challenges in reconciling growth and justice in Northern Sweden's green transition”, Energy Research & Social Science 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103537
Haikola, S & J. Anshelm (2023) Staten, marknaden och industripolitikens återupprättelse. Visioner om transportsystemets klimatomställning, 2006–2022. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/9789180750790
Halfacree, K. (1993) ”Locality and social representation. Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural”, Journal of Rural Studies 9(1): 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3
Lundgren, A. S. & A. Johansson (2017) ”Digital rurality: Producing the countryside in online struggles for rural survival”, Journal of Rural Studies 51: 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.001
Lundgren, A. S. & E. Liliequist (2020) ”Utmana och bekräfta: andra bilder av landsbygden?”, 165–183 i A. S. Lundgren (red.) Makt, moral, motstånd: engagemang för norrländska landsbygder. Umeå universitet: Institutionen för kultur- och medievetenskaper.
Löwgren, S. (2021) ”Investigating factors influencing community acceptance of established hydroelectric dams in northern Sweden”, Human Ecology Review 27(1): 101–124. https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.27.01.2021.06
Löwgren, S. & J.Syssner (2025) ”Parallels and divergences. A thematic reading of degrowth and shrinkage literatures”, Planning Practice & Research https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2025.2530544
Nilsson, B. & A. S. Lundgren (2015) ”Logics of rurality. Political rhetoric about the Swedish North”, Journal of Rural Studies 37: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.012
Nilsson, B. & A. S. Lundgren (2018) ”’For a living countryside.’ Political rhetoric about Swedish rural areas”, European Urban and Regional Studies 25(1): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416679216
Rönnblom, M. (2014) Ett urbant tolkningsföreträde? En studie av hur landsbygd skapas i nationell policy. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
Shucksmith, M. & D. L. Brown (2016) ”Framing rural studies in the Global North”, 31–56 i M. Shucksmith & D. L. Brown (red.) Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies. London & New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Svensson, L. (2014) ”Nu styr vi upp stan!”, 145–187 i M. Vallström (red.) När verkligheten inte stämmer med kartan. Lokala förutsättningar för hållbar utveckling. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
Syssner, J. (2018) (red.) Nya visioner för landsbygden. Boxholm: Linnefors förlag.
Vallström, Maria (2014) ”Berättelser som plats, platsen som berättelse”, 57–97 i M. Vallström (red.) När verkligheten inte stämmer med kartan. Lokala förutsättningar för hållbar utveckling. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
Westholm, E. (2018) ”På landsbygden intet nytt?”, 41–62 i J. Syssner (red.) Nya visioner för landsbygden. Boxholm: Linnefors förlag.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sara Löwgren
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All content in Sociologisk Forskning is published with immediate open access, under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
All content may be read, downloaded, shared and printed for non-commercial purposes, free and without fees. Contents may not be altered. When content is reused, author, source and a link to the copyright licence must be provided. The author retains copyright to their content. No publication fees are charged.
