Pathways in environmental sociology
Expertise, climate science and science denial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.63.27559Keywords:
post-truth, STS, expert knowledge, climate denial, environmental sociologyAbstract
The article examines theory choices and conceptions of knowledge within the field of environmental sociology against the backdrop of recent electoral successes of climate- and science-denying right-wing populist parties. The new political situation calls for a critical review of epistemological positions within the field. A central question concerns how findings from climate science should be integrated into sociological studies of the climate crisis – either as a point of departure or as an object of problematization. Another key tension lies between the risk that anti-democratic expert regimes may legitimize themselves by invoking a climate emergency, and the opposing risk that the public is misled and kept ignorant of the causes and consequences of climate change. How one positions oneself on these issues largely depends on whether expertise is understood as grounded in substantive knowledge of external realities or as a relational, socially attributed property. Positions within environmental sociology tend to be divided between a natural-scientific and/or political–economic orientation and an STS-inspired orientation. Through a close reading of the work of Rolf Lidskog and Göran Sundqvist – two prominent representatives of the latter approach – the article examines epistemological assumptions and lines of conflict within environmental sociology. The aim of the article is to clarify the crossroads facing environmental sociology in a time of climate emergency, crisis of trust in expertise, and authoritarian populism.
References
Antonio, R. & B. Clark (2015) ”The climate change divide in social theory”, 333–368 i R. Dunlap & R. J. Brulle (red.) Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Asayama, S., K. De Pryck, S. Beck, B. Cointe, P. N. Edwards, H. Guillemot, K. M. Gustafsson, F. Hartz, H. Hughes, B. Lahn, O. Leclerc, R. Lidskog, J. E. Livingston, I. Lorenzoni, J. P. MacDonald, M. Mahony, J. C. H. Miguel, M. Monteiro, J. O’Reilly, W. Pearce, A. Petersen, B. Siebenhüner, T. Skodvin, A. Standring, G. Sundqvist, R. Taddei, B. Bavel, M. Vardy, Y. Yamineva & M. Hulme (2023) ”Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC”, Nature Climate Change 13 (9):877–880.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01780-8
Beck, U. (2000 [1986]) Risksamhället: på väg mot en annan modernitet. Göteborg: Daidalos.
Berg, M. & R. Lidskog (2018) ”Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: a deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance”, Environmental Politics 27 (1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919
Bloor, D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
Boström, M. & Lidskog, R. (2024) Environmental Sociology and Social Transformations: Key Issues. London: Routledge.
Bjurström, A. & M. Polk (2011) ”Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report”, Climatic Change 108:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0018-8
Catton, W. & R. Dunlap (1980) ”A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-exuberant Sociology”, American Behavioral Scientist 24 (1):15–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428002400103
Collin, F (2011) Science Studies as Naturalized Philosophy. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9741-5
Collins, H. & R. Evans (2002) ”The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience”, Social Studies of Science 32 (2):235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003
Collins, H. & R. Evans (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Collins, H., R. Evans, D. Durant & M. Weinel (2020) Experts and the Will of the People: Society, Populism and Science. Springer International Publishing. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26983-8
Dunlap, R. & W. Catton (1994) ”Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The Rise, Decline and Revitalisation of Environmental Sociology”, American Sociologist 25 (1):5–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691936
Dunlap, R. E. & A. M. McCright (2011) ”Organized climate change denial”, 144–160 i J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard & D. Schlosberg (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.001.0001
Durant, D. (2010) ”Public Participation in the Making of Science Policy”, Perspectives on Science 18 (2): 189–225.
https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.2010.18.2.189.
Ekberg, K. & V Pressfeldt (2022) ”A Road to Denial: Climate Change and Neoliberal Thought in Sweden, 1988–2000”, Contemporary European History 31(4): 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096077732200025X.
Epstein, S. (2023) ”The meaning and significance of lay expertise”, 76–102 i G. Eyal & T. Medvetz (red.) Oxford Handbook of Expertise and Democratic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190848927.013.4.
Eyal, G. (2019) The Crisis of Expertise. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Freudenburg, W., S. Frickel & R. Gramling (1995) ”Beyond the Nature/Society Divide: Learning to Think about a Mountain”, Sociological Forum 10 (5):361–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095827
Freudenburg, W. (2008) ”Thirty Years of Scholarship and Science on Environment–Society Relationships”, Organization & Environment 21 (4): 449-459.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608328868
Frickel, S. & K. Moore (2006) The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Frickel, S. & Arancibia, F. (2021) ”Environmental Science and Technology Studies”, i B. Caniglia, S. Malin, L. Peek, D. Pellow & A. Jorgenson (red.) International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. London: Springer.
Grundmann, R. & N. Stehr (2010) ”Climate Change: What Role for Sociology? A Response to Constance Lever-Tracy”, Current Sociology 58 (6):897–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392110376031
Hansson, S. O. (2020) ”Social constructivism and climate science denial”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (37). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00305-w
Hermansen, E., B. Lahn, G. Sundqvist & E. Øye (2021) ”Post-Paris policy relevance: lessons from the IPCC SR15 process”, Climatic Change 169: 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03210-0
Hermansen, E. & G. Sundqvist (2022) ”Top‑down or bottom‑up? Norwegian climate mitigation”, Climatic Change 171: 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03309-y
IPCC (2021) Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irwin, A. & M. Michael (2003) Science, Social Theory & Public Knowledge. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2003) ”Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, ’The Third Wave of Science Studies’”, Social Studies of Science 33(3), 389–400. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3183123
Jasanoff, S. (2006) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
Jasanoff, S. (2010) ”A new climate for society”, Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3):233–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640936149
Jasanoff, S. (2022) ”The Discontents of Truth & Trust in 21st Century America”, Daedalus 151 (4):25-42.
Lever-Tracy, C. (2008) ”Global Warming and Sociology”, Current Sociology 56 (3):445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107088238
Lidskog, R., G. Sundqvist & Y Uggla (2005) Risk, expertis och demokrati: Allmänhetens inflytande i samhällets riskhantering. Göteborg: STS Research Reports 10.
Lidskog, R., L. Soneryd & Y. Uggla (2005) ”Knowledge, power and control – studying environmental regulation in late modernity”, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 7 (2):89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500338473
Lidskog, R. (2008) ”Scientised Citizens and Democratised Science: Re-assessing the Expert–Lay Divide”, Journal of Risk Research 11 (1–2):69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701521636
Lidskog, R. & G. Sundqvist (2011a) Miljösociologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Lidskog, R. & Sundqvist, G. (2011b) ”Transboundary Air Pollution Policy in Transition”, 19–62 i R. Lidskog & G. Sundqvist (red.) Governing the Air. The Dynamics of Science, Policy, and Citizen Interaction. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lidskog, R. & G. Sundqvist (2011c) ”Science–Policy–Citizen Dynamics in International Environmental Governance”, s. 417–464 i R. Lidskog & G. Sundqvist (red.) Governing the Air. The Dynamics of Science, Policy, and Citizen Interaction. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lidskog, R, & G. Sundqvist (2015) ”When Does Science Matter? International Relations Meets Science and Technology Studies”, Global Environmental Politics 15 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00269
Lidskog, R. & G. Sundqvist (2018a) ”Environmental expertise as group belonging: Environmental sociology meets Science and Technology Studies”, Nature and Culture 13 (3), 309–31. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2018.130301
Lidskog, R. & G. Sundqvist (2018b) ”Environmental Expertise”, 167–186 i M. Boström & D. Davidson (red.) Environment and Society: Concepts and Challenges. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Lidskog, R., & M. Berg (2022) ”Expertise, lay/local knowledge and the environment”, 257–269 i L. Pellizzoni, E. Leonardi & V. Asara (red.) Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Lidskog, R., A. Standring & J. M. White (2022) ”Environmental expertise for social transformation: roles and responsibilities for social science”, Environmental Sociology 8 (3):255-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2022.2048237
Lidskog R, & G. Sundqvist (2022a) ”Lost in transformation: The Paris Agreement, the IPCC and the quest for national transformative change”, Frontiers in Climate 4.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.906054
Lidskog R, & G. Sundqvist (2022b) ”Political Context”, 209–216 i K. De Pryck & M. Hulme (red.) A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009082099
Lidskog, R. (2023) ”Miljösociologi i går, i dag och i morgon”, Sociologisk Forskning 60 (3–4): 371–377.
Lidskog, R. & G. Sundqvist (2024) ”Environmental Expertise”, 225–229 i C. Overdevest (red.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Sociology. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Michaels, D. (2008) ”Manufactured Uncertainty”, 90–107 i R. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (red.) Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Oreskes, N., & E. M. Conway (2010) ”Defeating the merchants of doubt”, Nature 465 (7299):686–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/465686a
Porcelli, A. M. & J. F. Besek (2021) ”Sub-disciplining Science in Sociology: Bridges and Barriers between Environmental STS and Environmental Sociology”, Environmental Sociology 8 (2):149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.1991647
Proctor, N. R, & L. Schiebinger (red.) (2008) Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rabe, L. (2023) ”Har Sociologisk Forskning något att säga om klimatkrisen? En forskningsöversikt av det senaste decenniets publikationer”, Sociologisk Forskning 60 (3–4):229–249. https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.60.25398
Scoville, C. & A. McCumber (2023) ”Climate Silence in Sociology? How Elite American Sociology, Environmental Sociology, and Science and Technology Studies Treat Climate Change”, Sociological Perspectives 66 (5):888–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214231180554
Sismondo, S. (2017) ”Post-truth?”, Social Studies of Science 47(1): 3–6.
Soneryd, L. & G. Sundqvist (2023) Science and Democracy: A Science and Technology Studies Approach. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Sundqvist, G. (2014) ”'Heating up' or ’cooling down'? Analysing and performing broadened participation in technoscientific conflicts”, Environment and Planning 46 (9):2065–2079. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4611
Sundqvist, G. & L. Soneryd (2019) Vetenskap och demokrati. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Sundqvist, G., I. Bohlin, E. A. Hermansen & S. Yearley (2015) ”Formalization and separation: A systematic basis for interpreting approaches to summarizing science for climate policy”, Social Studies of Science 45 (3):416–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715583737
Sundqvist, G. (2021) Vem bryr sig? Om klimatforskning och klimatpolitik. Göteborg: Bokförlaget Daidalos.
Sundqvist, G. (2023) ”Vem bryr sig om klimatsociologen?”, Sociologisk Forskning 60 (3-4): 379–389.
https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.60.25973
Sundqvist, G. & S. Linke (2024) ”Making Science Relevant: Comparing Two Science Advisory Organizations Beyond the Linear Knowledge Model”, Minerva 62: 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09528-0
Söderberg, J. (2021) ”The Moment of Post-Truth for Science and Technology Studies”, i K. Rommetveit (red.), Post-truth imaginations: New Starting Points for Critique of Politics and Technoscience. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
Söderberg, J. (2022) Kritik av underdog-metafysiken. Lund: Celanders.
Söderberg, J. (2025) "Har den vetenskapliga metoden bytt politisk färg? Från postmodernism till post-sanning", i V. Hallberg & A. Burman (red.) Tillståndet: Om postmodernismen och dess lärdomar. Göteborg: Daidalos.
Vowles, K. (2024). ”Fuelling denial: The climate change reactionary movement and Swedish far-right media”, Chalmers tekniska högskola. https://search.proquest.com/openview/9eaa869377e796e89a0a614d67e653a3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
White, D. (2006) ”A Political Sociology of Socionatures”, Environmental Politics 15(1):59–77.
Wynne, B. (1994) ”Scientific knowledge and the global environment”, 169–189 i M. Redclift & T. Benton (red.) Social theory and the global environment. London: Routledge.
Wynne, B. (1996) ”SSK’s identity parade: Signing-up, off-and-on”, Social Studies of Science 26(2):357–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026002007
Wynne, B. (2003). ”Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002)”, Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401–417. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3183124
Wynne, B. (2010) ”Strange weather, again”, Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2–3):289–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410361499
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Johan Söderberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All content in Sociologisk Forskning is published with immediate open access, under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
All content may be read, downloaded, shared and printed for non-commercial purposes, free and without fees. Contents may not be altered. When content is reused, author, source and a link to the copyright licence must be provided. The author retains copyright to their content. No publication fees are charged.
