Slutreplik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37062/sf.63.28758Keywords:
Debatt, MiljösociologiReferences
Frickel, S. & K. Moore (red.) (2015) New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lidskog, R. (2025a) ”Expert advice and global environmental governance: institutional and epistemic challenges for assessment bodies”, Sustainability 17 (17):7876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177876
Lidskog, R. (2025b) ”Navigating global environmental challenges: Disciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the emergence of mega-expertise”, Climate 13 (1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13010020
Mirowski, P. (2011) Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sundqvist, G. (2024) ”Expertise, legitimacy, and decision-making”, 377–386 i U. Felt & A. Irwin (red.) Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377998.ch39
Söderberg, J. (2021) ”The Moment of Post-Truth for Sciencs and Technology Studies”, i K. Rommetveit (red.) Post-truth imaginations. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Johan Söderberg

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All content in Sociologisk Forskning is published with immediate open access, under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
All content may be read, downloaded, shared and printed for non-commercial purposes, free and without fees. Contents may not be altered. When content is reused, author, source and a link to the copyright licence must be provided. The author retains copyright to their content. No publication fees are charged.



